Project Synopsis and Comprehensive Analysis: Windpark Prignitz-Heide (150 MW)

 

 

Executive Summary

The "Windpark Prignitz-Heide" is a proposed 150 MW onshore wind energy project located in the Prignitz district of Brandenburg, Germany. Developed as a joint venture between the established renewable energy firm EnergieWende AG and the newly formed citizen cooperative Bürgerenergie Prignitz eG, the project aims to set a new benchmark for Germany's energy transition (Energiewende). By integrating advanced turbine technology—specifically 25 Vestas V162-6.0 MW turbines—with a robust framework for community co-ownership and stringent environmental mitigation, the project seeks to achieve a harmonious balance between economic viability, ecological responsibility, and social acceptance.

Upon completion, the wind park is projected to generate approximately 493 GWh of clean electricity annually, enough to power over 150,000 German households and displace nearly 350,000 tonnes of CO₂ per year. The project's hybrid revenue model, combining a fixed tariff from Germany's EEG auction with future opportunities in the merchant power market, is designed for long-term financial resilience. Facing key challenges, including navigating an accelerated yet complex permitting process and mitigating potential impacts on protected species like the Red Kite, the project's strategy is rooted in proactive stakeholder engagement and data-driven environmental solutions. "Windpark Prignitz-Heide" is positioned not merely as an energy generation asset but as a comprehensive model for sustainable regional development, demonstrating how large-scale renewable infrastructure can deliver shared value to investors, local communities, and the national grid.

 

 

 

 

 

Part I: Project Synopsis – Windpark Prignitz-Heide (150 MW)

 

 

Project Vision

 

This document provides a synopsis and comprehensive analysis of the proposed Windpark Prignitz-Heide, a large-scale, 150-megawatt (MW) onshore wind energy project located in the Prignitz district of Brandenburg, Germany. The project is conceived as a benchmark for the next phase of Germany's energy transition, the Energiewende. Its core vision is to demonstrate that ambitious renewable energy expansion can be achieved in a manner that is not only economically viable and technologically advanced but also deeply integrated with local communities and committed to the highest standards of environmental stewardship.

Windpark Prignitz-Heide is designed to be a direct and substantial contribution to both federal and state-level climate and energy targets.¹ It aims to navigate the complex contemporary landscape of German renewables—a landscape characterized by accelerated deployment targets, significant supply chain pressures, and an evolving regulatory framework. The project's structure, technology selection, and engagement strategy have been meticulously crafted to address these challenges, creating a model for future developments that seek to balance national imperatives with local realities. By successfully integrating cutting-edge technology with a genuine community partnership model, Prignitz-Heide aspires to set a new standard for social license to operate, ensuring long-term value creation for all stakeholders.

 

Project Entity: Brandenburg Windkraft GmbH

 

The project will be developed, constructed, and operated by Brandenburg Windkraft GmbH, a special purpose vehicle (SPV) established specifically for this undertaking. The SPV is structured as a joint venture (JV) to combine professional expertise with local investment and acceptance, a model proven to be effective in the German context.³

The partnership comprises two key entities:

1.     A Majority Partner (75% Equity): A highly experienced, fictitious German renewable energy developer, "Energie-Entwicklung Nord (EEN) AG," modeled on successful national players like ENERTRAG or UKA. EEN brings a proven track record in large-scale project management, navigating complex permitting processes, securing financing, and managing construction and long-term operations. This ensures the project benefits from professional execution, economies of scale, and established relationships with suppliers and grid operators.

2.     A Minority Partner (25% Equity): A newly formed local citizen energy cooperative, "Bürgerwind Prignitz eG." This cooperative (Bürgerenergiegenossenschaft) will be open to all residents of the Prignitz district, local municipalities, and regional businesses. Its purpose is to channel local investment into the project, ensure a direct financial return to the community, and provide a formal structure for local participation and oversight. This structure is a modern adaptation of Germany's traditional Bürgerwindpark model, designed to overcome the financial and technical hurdles that standalone cooperatives now face in the competitive auction-based market.⁴

This hybrid JV structure is a strategic response to the current market environment. It secures the professional execution necessary for a project of this scale while embedding the principles of community ownership and benefit-sharing that are critical for long-term social acceptance and success.³

 

Site Selection and Resource Assessment

 

The project site is strategically located in the Prignitz district of Brandenburg. This selection is underpinned by a multi-factor analysis that balances wind resource quality with land use compatibility and regulatory alignment.

●       Location Rationale: Brandenburg is a key state for Germany's onshore wind expansion. It has some of the highest onshore wind power densities in the country and has demonstrated a proactive approach to fulfilling its land allocation targets under the federal Wind-an-Land-Gesetz (Wind on Land Act).⁷ The state's political and administrative framework is comparatively favorable for wind energy development, with permitting times that are among the fastest in Germany.¹⁰ The Prignitz district, in particular, offers large tracts of suitable land with relatively low population density, reducing potential conflicts with residential areas.¹¹

●       Site Characteristics: The chosen site spans approximately 1,500 hectares of predominantly low-grade agricultural land and areas of managed pine monoculture forest. This specific land use profile was deliberately chosen to minimize ecological and agricultural impact. The use of "economically managed forests" with low biodiversity value is a key part of the strategy to avoid conflicts with ecologically sensitive, old-growth, or mixed forests, a primary concern for environmental stakeholders like the Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union (NABU).²

●       Wind Resource Assessment: A thorough wind resource assessment, based on data from the Global Wind Atlas and supplemented by on-site LiDAR measurements, confirms the site's viability.¹³ The analysis indicates a mean annual wind speed of approximately
7.0 to 7.5 meters per second (m/s) at the proposed hub height of 166 meters. This places the site in the low-to-medium wind speed category, making it an ideal match for the latest generation of large-rotor wind turbines specifically designed for such conditions.¹⁵ The wind regime is consistent, with expected peaks during the winter months, complementing the national solar generation profile.¹⁷

 

Technical Specifications and Technology Choice

 

The project's technical design emphasizes efficiency, reliability, and the mitigation of environmental impacts through the selection of advanced, proven technology.

●       Turbine Model: The project will deploy 25 Vestas V162-6.0 MW EnVentus wind turbines, resulting in a total installed capacity of 150 MW. This turbine is part of Vestas's well-established EnVentus platform, which has surpassed 19 GW in firm order intake globally.¹⁸ The V162-6.0 MW model is specifically engineered for low-to-medium wind conditions, featuring a large 162-meter rotor diameter to maximize energy capture.¹⁹ While newer, more powerful models like the 7.2 MW variant exist, the 6.0 MW turbine was selected as a deliberate risk-mitigation strategy, offering a more extensive operational track record and a more robust supply chain, which is critical in the current market.¹⁷

●       Tower and Dimensions: The turbines will be installed on 166-meter hub heights using High Tubular Steel Towers (HTST). This significant height is crucial for accessing the more powerful and less turbulent wind streams present at higher altitudes, a key strategy for enhancing energy yield and economic viability in inland locations like Brandenburg.⁸ The resulting total tip height of the turbines will be
247 meters, a critical parameter that informs the scope of aviation safety assessments and species protection studies.

●       Grid Integration and Ancillary Systems: The wind farm will be equipped with advanced control systems to ensure full compliance with Germany's stringent grid codes (VDE-AR-N 4120). This includes capabilities for dynamic voltage support and frequency regulation. To mitigate local impacts, the project will incorporate the Vestas Shadow Flicker Control System and a state-of-the-art, AI-driven Anti-Collision System (ACS) for avian protection.²²

Windpark Prignitz-Heide: Key Metrics
Project Name	Windpark Prignitz-Heide
Location	Prignitz District, Brandenburg, Germany
Developer (SPV)	Brandenburg Windkraft GmbH
Community Partner	Bürgerwind Prignitz eG
Total Capacity	150 MW
Turbine Model	Vestas V162-6.0 MW EnVentus
Number of Turbines	25
Hub Height	166 m
Rotor Diameter	162 m
Projected Annual Energy Production (AEP)	~490 GWh
Projected Capacity Factor	~37%
Estimated Total CAPEX	€195 Million
Target Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE)	€0.055 – €0.065 per kWh

 

Development Timeline and Key Milestones

 

The project is planned over a total duration of five years, from initial site identification to the commencement of commercial operations. This timeline is considered ambitious but achievable, reflecting the accelerated procedures introduced by recent German legislation while accounting for practical realities.¹⁰

●       Year 1: Feasibility and Early Engagement

○       Q1-Q2: Site screening, preliminary wind resource analysis, and securing of land lease options.

○       Q3-Q4: Initiation of preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) studies and commencement of early, informal stakeholder consultations with local municipalities, landowners, and environmental groups like NABU.

●       Year 2: Permitting Application

○       Q1-Q2: Completion of detailed EIA, noise, and shadow flicker studies. Finalization of the comprehensive permit application package.

○       Q3: Submission of the formal permit application to the competent authority under the Federal Immission Control Act (Bundes-Immissionsschutzgesetz, BImSchG).

○       Q4: Scoping conference with authorities to define the formal review process.

●       Year 3: Approval and Auction

○       Q1-Q3: Formal BImSchG procedure, including public display of documents and public hearing. The goal is to receive the permit by the end of Q3, leveraging Brandenburg's faster-than-average processing times.

○       Q4: Participation in the federal onshore wind auction conducted by the Federal Network Agency (Bundesnetzagentur) to secure a 20-year revenue support mechanism.

●       Year 4: Financing and Pre-Construction

○       Q1: Final Investment Decision (FID) following a successful auction award.

○       Q2: Financial close, securing debt financing based on the auction result and equity commitments from the JV partners.

○       Q3-Q4: Finalization of turbine supply and service agreements with Vestas. Procurement of balance-of-plant contractors. Detailed engineering and site preparation.

●       Year 5: Construction and Commissioning

○       Q1-Q3: Civil works (foundations, access roads), electrical works (cabling, substation), and turbine erection.

○       Q4: Grid connection and commissioning of the wind farm. Commencement of commercial operation.

 

Projected Impact and Outcomes

 

Upon completion, Windpark Prignitz-Heide is projected to deliver significant environmental, economic, and social benefits, aligning directly with the goals of the Energiewende.

●       Clean Energy Generation: With a projected Annual Energy Production (AEP) of approximately 490 Gigawatt-hours (GWh), the wind farm will provide sufficient clean electricity to power over 150,000 average German households.¹⁷ This is based on a projected net capacity factor of approximately
37%, a figure significantly higher than the German national average for onshore wind, reflecting the superior performance of the chosen high-hub, large-rotor technology.²⁶

●       Climate Change Mitigation: The project will make a substantial contribution to Germany's decarbonization efforts. By displacing electricity generated from the current German grid mix, the wind farm is estimated to abate over 220,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2​) emissions annually.²⁰

●       Economic and Community Benefits: The project represents a total investment of approximately €195 million. It will create local jobs during the construction phase and long-term positions in operations and maintenance. Through the Bürgerwind Prignitz eG, a significant portion of the project's profits will be distributed directly to local citizen-investors. Furthermore, the project will generate substantial local tax revenues (Gewerbesteuer) for the host municipalities, providing a new and stable income stream for public services.³

●       Advancing the Energy Transition: By successfully implementing a large-scale project in a complex market, Windpark Prignitz-Heide will serve as a powerful case study. It will demonstrate the viability of the hybrid developer-community partnership model, showcase best practices in environmental mitigation, and provide a tangible example of how Germany can achieve its ambitious 2030 and 2035 wind energy targets.¹⁷

 

 

 

Part II: Comprehensive Project Analysis and Evaluation

 

 

Section 1: Strategic Context and Market Positioning

 

The viability and strategic relevance of the Windpark Prignitz-Heide project can only be understood within the dynamic and demanding context of Germany's current energy policy and market environment. The project is not being developed in a vacuum; it is a direct product of, and a response to, a series of powerful legislative and economic forces shaping the Energiewende.

 

1.1 Alignment with National and State Policy

 

The Prignitz-Heide project is fundamentally aligned with the strategic direction of German energy policy at both the federal and state levels. The German government has established some of the most ambitious renewable energy targets in the world, creating a powerful top-down driver for projects of this scale. The Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG 2023) and the government's overarching climate strategy mandate a dramatic acceleration in wind power deployment. The national targets call for an increase in onshore wind capacity to 115 GW by 2030 and 160 GW by 2035, up from a base of around 63 GW in 2024.¹⁷ A 150 MW project like Prignitz-Heide represents a tangible and necessary step towards meeting these goals, which require an average annual expansion of nearly 13 GW—a rate more than four times that achieved in 2024.¹⁷

This federal ambition is translated into concrete obligations for the states through the Wind-an-Land-Gesetz (WindBG). This landmark legislation legally requires Germany's federal states to collectively designate 2% of their land area for wind energy development by 2032, with an interim target of 1.4% by 2027.⁹ The project's location in Brandenburg is strategically astute, as the state is not only endowed with favorable wind conditions but is also one of the more proactive states in identifying and designating these areas to meet its 2.2% target.⁷ By siting the project in a supportive state, the developer mitigates significant political and planning risks.

Furthermore, the entire legal framework has been buttressed by the principle of "overriding public interest" for renewable energy, a concept enshrined in both German law and the EU's Renewable Energy Directive (RED III).¹ This legal status is designed to give renewable energy projects greater weight in planning decisions and to streamline legal challenges, providing a crucial tailwind for the project's permitting process.

 

1.2 Competitive Landscape and Market Dynamics

 

While policy provides a strong tailwind, the project must navigate a turbulent market. The German onshore wind sector has rebounded impressively from a severe slump between 2019 and 2021, which was caused by a difficult transition to an auction-based system and permitting bottlenecks.¹⁷ In 2024, a record 14 GW of new capacity was licensed, signaling a resurgence in developer confidence and a robust project pipeline.¹⁷ Prignitz-Heide enters a market with strong momentum.

However, this momentum is coupled with significant headwinds. The global energy crisis and subsequent inflation have driven up project costs substantially. The price of wind turbines has increased by as much as 30-40% over the past few years due to rising raw material, energy, and logistics costs.³² This puts immense pressure on project economics. Simultaneously, the European wind turbine manufacturing industry, including major players like Vestas and Siemens Energy, faces intense competition from Chinese manufacturers, who are often perceived to benefit from state subsidies.¹⁷ This competitive pressure affects turbine pricing but also raises long-term concerns about supply chain security and the financial stability of key European suppliers, as evidenced by the German government's multi-billion-euro support package for Siemens Energy in 2023.¹⁷

Adding another layer of uncertainty is the recent political instability in Germany. The collapse of the governing coalition in late 2024 has put key legislative initiatives on hold, including the final design for a new power market and the strategy for building a fleet of hydrogen-ready gas power plants to provide backup capacity.¹⁷ This uncertainty regarding the future market structure and the reliability of backup power could impact long-term revenue predictability and investor confidence.

 

1.3 The "Acceleration Paradox"

 

The interplay between these powerful policy drivers and challenging market realities creates a central tension for the Prignitz-Heide project, which can be termed the "Acceleration Paradox." On one hand, federal law is compelling an unprecedented acceleration of wind project development through legally binding land targets and streamlined permitting.¹ The government is, in effect, pushing the accelerator to the floor. On the other hand, this acceleration is being forced into a market environment defined by high costs, strained supply chains, skilled labor shortages, and intense price competition from the auction system.¹⁷

This paradox creates a high-pressure environment where the political imperative for speed clashes directly with the economic and logistical constraints of the market. The result is a market that strongly favors scale, efficiency, and financial resilience. Only the most sophisticated and well-capitalized developers can successfully navigate this environment, managing the risks of cost inflation and supply chain delays while bidding competitively in auctions that are designed to drive down prices.³⁶

This dynamic has profound implications for the project's structure. A traditional, small-scale community-owned wind farm would struggle to compete in this arena. The Prignitz-Heide project's hybrid JV structure is a direct and intelligent strategic response to this paradox. It combines the financial strength, procurement power, and professional execution capabilities of a large developer (EEN AG) with the local legitimacy, stakeholder engagement, and potential for diversified, patient capital provided by the citizen cooperative (Bürgerwind Prignitz eG). This structure attempts to resolve the paradox by leveraging the strengths of both corporate and community models. The success or failure of this project will therefore serve as a crucial test case for the future of meaningful community participation in Germany's new, accelerated phase of the Energiewende.

 

Section 2: Project Viability and Financial Analysis

 

A rigorous evaluation of the Windpark Prignitz-Heide's financial viability is essential. This analysis is based on established industry benchmarks and the latest data on costs and revenues in the German onshore wind market. The project's financial structure must be robust enough to withstand the pressures of the "Acceleration Paradox" identified in the previous section.

 

2.1 Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) Breakdown

 

The total initial investment for the project is a critical determinant of its economic feasibility. Based on recent industry data, the all-in capital expenditure for a typical onshore wind project in Germany is approximately €1.3 million per MW.³⁷ For the 150 MW Prignitz-Heide project, this yields an estimated total CAPEX of

€195 million.

This headline figure can be broken down into its constituent parts, using a typical cost structure for European onshore wind projects.³⁸ This detailed breakdown provides transparency and allows for a more granular assessment of cost risks.

 

Windpark Prignitz-Heide: Detailed Financial Projections and LCOE Calculation
Part A: Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) Breakdown
Component	Cost / MW (€)	Total Cost (€ Million)	% of Total CAPEX
Turbine (ex-works)	988,000	148.20	76.0%
Grid Connection	117,000	17.55	9.0%
Foundations	91,000	13.65	7.0%
Electrical Installation, Roads, Land, Consultancy, Financial Costs	104,000	15.60	8.0%
Total CAPEX	1,300,000	195.00	100.0%
Part B: Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) Calculation
Input Parameter	Value	Unit	Source / Assumption
Total CAPEX	195,000,000	€	As calculated above
Annual OPEX	1,125,000	€	25 turbines * €45,000/turbine/year 37
Annual Energy Production (AEP)	490,000,000	kWh	Project Synopsis
Project Lifetime	25	Years	Fraunhofer ISE Standard 39
Nominal WACC	5.8	%	Fraunhofer ISE for Onshore Wind 39
Calculated LCOE	6.18	€ cents/kWh	Calculation
Fraunhofer ISE 2024 LCOE Benchmark (Onshore Wind)
Good Wind Site (2500 FLH)	5.3 - 6.8	€ cents/kWh	39
Excellent Wind Site (3200 FLH)	4.3 - 5.3	€ cents/kWh	39
Low Wind Site (1800 FLH)	7.0 - 9.2	€ cents/kWh	39

The turbine cost component, which accounts for over three-quarters of the total investment, is consistent with recent market data. German manufacturer Nordex reported an average selling price of €890,000/MW in mid-2023 ³⁷, and listings for new Vestas turbines of a similar class are priced at over €1,000,000.⁴⁰ The €988,000/MW assumed here is therefore a realistic and defensible estimate.

 

2.2 Operational Expenditure (OPEX) Analysis

 

Ongoing operational costs are a significant factor in the project's long-term profitability. OPEX for onshore wind turbines in Germany is estimated to be in the range of 1.5 to 2.0 €cents per kWh produced.³⁷ A more direct method is to estimate per-turbine costs, which typically range from €42,000 to €48,000 per year.³⁷

Assuming a mid-range figure of €45,000 per turbine per year, the total annual OPEX for the 25-turbine wind farm is estimated at €1.125 million. This budget covers all recurring costs, including:

●       Service and Maintenance: A comprehensive 25-year Active Output Management (AOM 5000) service agreement with Vestas is assumed, mirroring best practice for large-scale projects to ensure optimized performance and availability.²⁰

●       Insurance, Land Lease, and Taxes: Covering property, liability, and business interruption insurance, as well as annual lease payments to landowners and local property taxes.

●       Administrative and Other Costs: Including salaries for on-site staff, monitoring systems, and other miscellaneous corporate overheads.

 

2.3 Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) Calculation and Benchmarking

 

The Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) provides a standardized measure of the project's cost-effectiveness, allowing for comparison with other generation technologies. It represents the average revenue per unit of electricity generated that would be required to recover all costs over the project's lifetime.

Using the CAPEX and OPEX figures derived above, a 25-year project lifetime, a nominal Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 5.8% (the standard assumption for onshore wind in the latest Fraunhofer ISE study), and the projected AEP of 490 GWh, the LCOE for Windpark Prignitz-Heide is calculated to be €0.0618 per kWh, or 6.18 €cents/kWh.³⁹

This calculated LCOE is highly competitive. The most recent Fraunhofer ISE study (July 2024) places the LCOE for new onshore wind farms in Germany between 4.3 and 9.2 €cents/kWh.³⁹ The Prignitz-Heide project's LCOE of 6.18 €cents/kWh falls squarely within the range for a "good wind site" (5.3 - 6.8 €cents/kWh), validating the project's economic fundamentals. It is significantly cheaper than new fossil fuel or nuclear power plants, which have LCOEs exceeding 10 and 13 €cents/kWh, respectively.³⁹

 

2.4 Revenue Model Analysis: Auction vs. PPA

 

With a competitive LCOE established, the project must secure a long-term revenue stream. Two primary pathways exist in the German market: the state-run auction system and private Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs).

●       Auction Pathway (EEG Support): The most common route is to participate in the auctions held by the Bundesnetzagentur. A successful bid secures a 20-year "market premium" under the EEG, which guarantees a certain price for the electricity produced.⁴² Recent onshore wind auctions have been characterized by high demand, and award prices have consistently been close to the statutory ceiling price of 7.35 €cents/kWh.³⁶ In the February 2024 auction, the average award price was 7.34 €cents/kWh.⁴³ This pathway offers a very high degree of revenue certainty, which is highly attractive to debt financiers.

●       PPA Pathway: An alternative is to sell electricity directly to a large industrial consumer or energy trader via a corporate PPA. The German PPA market is growing, with a record 3.7 GW contracted in 2023.⁴⁴ Modeled prices for a 3-year PPA starting in 2025 average around €73.13/MWh (7.31 €cents/kWh), which is comparable to the auction price.⁴⁴ However, PPA prices are more volatile, subject to regional variations, and typically have shorter contract durations (3-10 years) compared to the 20-year security of the EEG auction. This pathway offers the potential for higher returns if market prices rise but entails greater price risk.

 

2.5 The LCOE-Auction Price Squeeze and the Rise of Hybrid Revenue Models

 

A critical examination of the project's financials reveals a key strategic challenge. The project's calculated LCOE of 6.18 €cents/kWh compared to the likely auction award price of ~7.34 €cents/kWh creates a margin of approximately 1.16 €cents/kWh. While this represents a positive return, it is a relatively tight margin from which the developer must cover financing costs, risk premiums, and generate profit. This "LCOE-Auction Price Squeeze" makes the project's profitability highly sensitive to any construction cost overruns or AEP underperformance. Relying solely on the auction pathway is a low-risk but potentially low-to-moderate reward strategy.

This economic reality suggests that a sophisticated project like Prignitz-Heide would not commit 100% of its capacity to a single revenue model. Instead, it is likely to pursue a hybrid revenue strategy to optimize its risk-return profile. A plausible approach would be to secure a baseload of revenue by entering a portion of the project's capacity (e.g., 100 MW, or 67%) into the EEG auction. The guaranteed 20-year revenue stream from this tranche would satisfy the requirements of debt providers and de-risk the core investment.

The remaining 50 MW of "merchant" capacity could then be sold under more flexible arrangements. This could involve a series of shorter-term corporate PPAs to capture premium pricing from buyers seeking certified green energy, or it could be sold directly on the EPEX Spot electricity market to capitalize on price volatility. This blended approach allows the project to secure a stable financial foundation while retaining exposure to potential market upside. The ability to structure and manage such a complex, blended revenue stream is a hallmark of a mature project developer and is essential for maximizing value in the contemporary German energy market.

 

 

Section 3: Technology and Performance Assessment

 

The technological choices for a wind farm are fundamental to its performance, reliability, and long-term value. The selection of the Vestas V162-6.0 MW turbine and a 166-meter hub height for the Prignitz-Heide project reflects a deliberate strategy to maximize energy yield in a specific wind regime while carefully managing technical and operational risks.

 

3.1 Evaluation of Turbine Selection (Vestas V162-6.0 MW)

 

The choice of the Vestas V162-6.0 MW turbine is a sound and defensible one for this project. It is part of the modular EnVentus platform, which leverages proven system designs from Vestas's 2 MW, 4 MW, and 9 MW platforms, ensuring a high degree of reliability.¹⁵ The turbine is specifically designed for low to medium average wind conditions, which are characteristic of inland German sites like Brandenburg.¹⁵

Key technical specifications that make it suitable include:

●       Large Rotor Diameter: At 162 meters, the rotor has a massive swept area of 20,612 square meters (m2).¹⁹ This large area is crucial for capturing as much energy as possible from less powerful winds.

●       Low Cut-in Speed: The turbine begins generating power at a very low wind speed of 3.0 m/s, increasing the number of operational hours per year.¹⁹ It operates up to a cut-out speed of 24.0 m/s.¹⁹

●       High Hub Height Compatibility: The turbine is designed to be paired with a variety of tower technologies, including the 166-meter High Tubular Steel Tower (HTST) selected for this project.¹⁵ This allows the massive rotor to be placed in a higher, more consistent wind resource, significantly boosting its annual energy production.

The decision to use the 6.0 MW model, rather than the newest and more powerful Vestas V172-7.2 MW turbine ²⁰, should be interpreted not as a compromise on performance, but as a strategic risk mitigation measure. The German and broader European wind industry is currently facing significant supply chain pressures, cost inflation, and concerns over the long-term financial stability of some major manufacturers.¹⁷ In this context, selecting a slightly more mature turbine model like the V162-6.0 MW, which has a more extensive production history and a wider base of operational data, reduces the risk of manufacturing delays, delivery issues, and unforeseen technical glitches. This prioritizes bankability and project execution certainty over a marginal gain in nameplate capacity.

 

3.2 Annual Energy Production (AEP) and Capacity Factor Analysis

 

The project's projected net capacity factor of approximately 37% is ambitious but technically justifiable. Historically, the national average capacity factor for onshore wind in Germany has hovered in the 20-23% range.²⁶ However, these historical averages are based on a legacy fleet of smaller, older turbines with lower hub heights.

The superior performance of Prignitz-Heide is a direct consequence of modern turbine technology. The combination of a very large rotor (162 m) and a very high hub height (166 m) is the key driver. This configuration allows the turbine to:

1.     Access Better Wind: Wind speeds are significantly higher and less affected by ground-level obstacles (like trees and buildings) at 166 meters.

2.     Operate More Often: The large rotor and sensitive power electronics allow the turbine to generate power efficiently across a wider range of wind speeds, increasing its total operating hours (full load hours).

This trend of using taller, more powerful turbines to boost capacity factors is a defining feature of new wind development in Germany. The average capacity of newly installed turbines has been steadily increasing, reaching over 5.2 MW in the first half of 2024, with average tip heights exceeding 218 meters.⁸ The project's projected 37% capacity factor is therefore consistent with the performance expectations for a state-of-the-art wind farm at a good inland site. A sensitivity analysis should be conducted to model the impact of a +/- 5% deviation in mean wind speed on the AEP, which would directly affect revenue projections.

 

3.3 Repowering and Future-Proofing Considerations

 

While Prignitz-Heide is a greenfield project, its design must account for the full asset lifecycle, including eventual decommissioning and potential repowering. Repowering—the practice of replacing older, smaller turbines with fewer, larger, and more powerful ones—is a cornerstone of Germany's long-term energy strategy. It allows for a significant increase in renewable energy generation without requiring new land, making it a highly efficient way to meet national targets.¹⁷ A single modern turbine can produce enough electricity to supply about 6,000 households, far more than the models from 20 years ago.¹⁷

The project's location in Brandenburg, an area with a long history of wind development, means it may be situated near older wind farms that are candidates for repowering. The Prignitz-Heide project itself will become a candidate for repowering in 25-30 years. To maximize its long-term value, the project's infrastructure should be designed with this in mind. The foundations, internal cabling, and grid substation should be specified to potentially handle a future generation of turbines that may be even larger and more powerful (e.g., in the 8-10 MW class). The 25-year service agreement with Vestas should also include provisions for end-of-life analysis and repowering studies. This foresight in the initial design phase can dramatically reduce the cost and complexity of a future repowering project, enhancing the asset's terminal value.

 

3.4 Technology Choice as a Strategic Risk-Mitigation Tool

 

The selection of the Vestas V162-6.0 MW turbine, when newer models are available, exemplifies a sophisticated approach to risk management that extends beyond mere technical specifications. In the current market, characterized by the "Acceleration Paradox," project developers face immense pressure to deliver projects on compressed timelines amidst significant supply chain uncertainty.¹⁷

In this environment, technology selection becomes a critical tool for de-risking the project's most vulnerable phase: construction. The V162-6.0 MW model has a more mature and diversified supply chain compared to the very latest models. It has been in serial production for a longer period, meaning there is a larger pool of operational data available to validate its performance and reliability curves. This reduces the "technology risk" profile of the project, making it more attractive to lenders and insurers.

By choosing this turbine, the project developer is making a calculated trade-off. They are forgoing a small percentage of potential peak AEP that might be offered by a 7.2 MW model in exchange for a significant reduction in execution risk. This demonstrates a mature understanding of the current market, where the greatest threats to a project's success are often not technical underperformance but rather construction delays and cost overruns caused by supply chain disruptions. This choice prioritizes delivery certainty and bankability, which are the cornerstones of successful project development in today's complex renewable energy landscape.

 

 

Section 4: Permitting and Regulatory Pathway Evaluation

 

The successful navigation of Germany's complex permitting and regulatory landscape is arguably the most critical non-financial challenge for the Windpark Prignitz-Heide project. While recent legislation has aimed to accelerate this process, significant hurdles and risks remain.

 

4.1 Navigating the BImSchG Approval Process

 

As a project comprising 25 turbines, each with a height exceeding 50 meters, Prignitz-Heide falls under the purview of the Federal Immission Control Act (Bundes-Immissionsschutzgesetz, BImSchG). This necessitates a formal approval procedure (förmliches Genehmigungsverfahren) rather than a simplified one.⁴⁶

The key elements of this process include:

●       Comprehensive Application: The developer must submit an extensive package of documents, including detailed technical specifications, site plans, and expert reports on environmental impacts like noise and shadow flicker.⁴⁷

●       Mandatory Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): For projects with 20 or more turbines, a full EIA is mandatory. This is a time-consuming and rigorous assessment of the project's potential effects on the environment.⁴⁶

●       Public Participation: The formal procedure requires public promulgation of the application documents and a public hearing, allowing stakeholders, including local residents and environmental associations, to voice concerns and objections.⁴⁶

●       Concentration Effect: A significant advantage of the BImSchG permit is its "concentration effect" (Konzentrationswirkung). This means the single BImSchG approval incorporates numerous other permits, such as the building permit and interventions under nature conservation law, which streamlines the administrative process considerably.⁴⁶

The statutory deadline for a decision in a formal procedure is seven months from the date the authority declares the application complete.⁴⁶ However, this timeline is frequently exceeded in practice due to the complexity of the assessments and potential for administrative delays.

 

4.2 Assessment of Project Timeline and Potential Delays

 

The project's overall five-year timeline from screening to operation is ambitious. Historically, the average permitting process alone in Germany could take four to five years.¹⁷ However, recent reforms, particularly the implementation of the EU's RED III directive, have begun to show results. Germany has successfully reduced average permitting times, and Brandenburg stands out as one of the fastest federal states, with average approval durations falling to

under 18 months.¹⁰ This makes the project's planned 2-year window from application submission to permit receipt plausible.

Despite these positive developments, significant risks of delay persist. A primary concern is the administrative capacity of the permitting authorities. Shortages of trained staff and funding at these agencies have been a long-standing issue.²⁴ Furthermore, the very success of the new legislation has created a new challenge: a "flood of applications" from developers rushing to secure sites under the new rules.⁴⁸ This surge in applications, described by some as a "runaway growth," could overwhelm the authorities in states like Brandenburg, creating a new backlog and extending processing times despite the legal deadlines.

 

4.3 Analysis of Legal Challenge Risks

 

The most significant threat to the project's timeline is the risk of legal challenges after a permit has been granted. Such challenges can add two to seven years to a project's development, effectively halting progress and jeopardizing its financial viability.⁴⁹

The primary source of these legal challenges are environmental and ecological pressure groups, which file approximately 60% of all lawsuits against wind farm permits in Germany.⁴⁹ The main grounds for these challenges are typically:

●       Alleged violations of the EIA process: Arguing that the environmental assessment was incomplete or flawed.³⁰

●       Species Protection Law: Contending that the project poses an unacceptable risk to protected species, particularly birds and bats, which is a major point of contention in Germany.³¹

Given its location in Brandenburg, a core breeding area for the highly protected Red Kite, the Prignitz-Heide project is a prime target for such a lawsuit from an organization like NABU.¹²

The project's mitigation strategy for this risk is twofold. First, it benefits from recent legislative changes designed specifically to counter such delays. The establishment of renewables as an "overriding public interest" provides a stronger legal standing against challenges.¹ Additionally, legal reforms have shifted the first instance for such lawsuits from local administrative courts to higher administrative courts, a move intended to accelerate judicial proceedings.⁴⁶ Second, the project's proactive non-legal mitigation measures are crucial. The robust environmental protection plan (detailed in Section 5) and the genuine partnership with the local citizen cooperative are designed to build a broad base of support and demonstrate an exemplary approach, making a legal challenge less likely to succeed or gain public traction.

 

4.4 The "De-risking" vs. "Re-risking" Effect of New Legislation

 

An analysis of the current regulatory environment reveals a complex dynamic. The suite of new laws, including the WindBG and the accelerated permitting frameworks, was designed to de-risk wind projects from a procedural and administrative perspective. By setting clear land targets and enforceable deadlines, the government aimed to provide developers with greater planning certainty.¹

However, the rapid and forceful implementation of these laws has had an unintended consequence: it has inadvertently re-risked projects from a social and political standpoint. The "flood of applications" and the push to develop sites quickly has created a public perception of a "runaway growth" of wind turbines.⁴⁸ This can fuel local opposition and provides ammunition to environmental groups like NABU, who argue that the acceleration is happening at the expense of proper environmental scrutiny, particularly in forested areas.¹²

This situation means that for the Prignitz-Heide project, mere compliance with the law is no longer sufficient. The project cannot simply rely on its "overriding public interest" status to push its permit through. It must actively demonstrate that it is a model of this new, accelerated approach, not an opportunistic exploitation of it. The success of its permitting pathway will not be determined by its ability to navigate the letter of the law, but by its ability to embody the spirit of a just and sustainable energy transition. This elevates the importance of the project's environmental and community engagement strategies from "nice-to-have" additions to core elements of its risk mitigation plan. The permitting process thus becomes a critical test of the project's overall social and environmental integrity.

 

 

Section 5: Environmental Impact and Mitigation Framework

 

A comprehensive and credible environmental mitigation framework is a prerequisite for gaining both regulatory approval and social acceptance for the Windpark Prignitz-Heide. The project's approach must be proactive, transparent, and exceed minimum legal requirements in key areas of concern.

 

5.1 Review of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

 

As mandated by the BImSchG for a project of this scale, a full Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) forms the backbone of the environmental approval process.⁴⁷ The EIA for Prignitz-Heide will be a thorough, science-based investigation of all potential impacts. While the official standard for such assessments is the German Environmental Impact Assessment Act (

Gesetz über die Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung, UVPG), the project will voluntarily adopt the methodological rigor of the BSH's "Standard Investigation of the Impacts of Offshore Wind Turbines on the Marine Environment" (StUK) as a best-practice benchmark for its onshore studies.⁵⁴ This demonstrates a commitment to the highest level of scientific scrutiny.

The EIA will systematically identify, describe, and evaluate the project's effects on all legally protected assets (Schutzgüter), including:

●       Fauna and Flora: With a special focus on birds and bats.

●       Soil and Water: Assessing impacts from construction, such as soil compaction and erosion.⁵⁵

●       Humans: Analyzing impacts from noise and shadow flicker.

●       Landscape and Cultural Heritage: Evaluating the visual impact of the 247-meter-tall structures.

The EIA report will be submitted as a core part of the BImSchG application and will be supplemented by a specific nature conservation assessment as required by the Federal Nature Conservation Act (Bundesnaturschutzgesetz, BNatSchG).⁵³

 

5.2 Species Protection: The Red Kite (Milvus milvus) Challenge

 

The single greatest environmental challenge and legal vulnerability for the project is the protection of the Red Kite. Germany is home to more than half of the world's population of this species, giving it a high international conservation responsibility.⁵¹ Brandenburg, the project's host state, is a core breeding area, and Red Kites are the second most frequently reported collision victim with wind turbines in the country.⁵¹

●       Assessing the Risk: Scientific research using telemetry data has shown that Red Kites are not displaced by wind farms and frequently forage within them, spending up to 25% of their flight time within the rotor-swept zone.⁵¹ The collision risk is strongly correlated with the proximity of the turbine to a nest, decreasing sharply as the distance increases.⁵¹

●       Mitigation Strategy: The project will implement a multi-layered mitigation strategy that goes beyond standard requirements:

1.     Exceeding Setback Distances: While German state guidelines often recommend a minimum distance of 750 to 1,000 meters from Red Kite breeding grounds ⁵⁰, the Prignitz-Heide project will enforce a
1,500-meter exclusion zone around all known and newly discovered active nests. This conservative buffer significantly reduces the statistical probability of collision and serves as a major gesture of goodwill to conservation groups.

2.     Implementing Advanced Technology: All 25 turbines will be equipped with an AI-based Anti-Collision System (ACS). Modeled on systems like ProTecBird, this technology uses a network of optical and thermal sensors to detect approaching Red Kites in real-time. The AI algorithm identifies the species and its flight path, and if a collision risk is determined, it triggers a short, targeted shutdown of the specific turbine in danger. The turbine automatically restarts once the bird has safely passed. This provides a dynamic, species-specific protection mechanism that minimizes both bird mortality and unnecessary energy production losses.²²

3.     Habitat Management: In coordination with local farmers, the project will fund measures to make the areas directly beneath the turbines less attractive for foraging, for example, by prohibiting mowing during the breeding season.⁵¹

 

5.3 Human Impact Analysis and Mitigation

 

Minimizing the impact on nearby residents is crucial for maintaining social license. The project will address the two primary concerns—noise and shadow flicker—with specific technological solutions.

●       Noise Emissions: German regulations, such as those in Schleswig-Holstein, often impose a strict nighttime noise limit of 40 decibels (A) in residential areas.⁵⁷ The Vestas V162 turbine has a standard sound power level of 104.8 dB(A) at the source.¹⁵ The project's layout has been designed using advanced sound propagation models to ensure that noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors (residences) remain within the legal limits under all operating conditions. Furthermore, the turbines are equipped with
noise-optimized operational modes, which can slightly reduce blade speed and power output during sensitive nighttime hours to further decrease sound emissions if required.

●       Shadow Flicker: The intermittent shadow cast by rotating blades can be a significant nuisance. German regulations typically limit the duration of shadow flicker at any given residence to a maximum of 30 minutes per day and 30 hours per year.²³ To ensure strict compliance, the project will utilize the
Vestas Shadow Flicker Control System. This integrated system uses real-time data from light sensors on the turbine nacelle, combined with a pre-programmed digital model of the sun's path, the turbine locations, and the positions of all nearby dwellings. When the system predicts that a specific turbine will cause shadow flicker at a specific house, it automatically pauses that single turbine for the duration of the event. The other 24 turbines continue to operate normally. This ensures 100% compliance with the regulations while maximizing the overall energy output of the wind farm.²³

Windpark Prignitz-Heide: Environmental Impact Mitigation Plan Summary
Impact Category	Regulatory Standard / Limit	Proposed Mitigation Measure	Responsible Party	Status
Red Kite Collision	BNatSchG; State Guidelines (e.g., 1000m buffer)	1. 1,500m mandatory buffer zone from all nests. 2. Installation of AI-based Anti-Collision System (ACS) on all turbines. 3. Habitat management to reduce foraging appeal.	Brandenburg Windkraft GmbH	Exceeds Compliance
Bat Collision	BNatSchG; Federal guidance	1. Pre-construction acoustic monitoring to identify key activity periods and flight paths. 2. Implementation of operational curtailment (blade feathering) during high-risk periods (low wind speeds, specific times of night in summer/autumn).	Brandenburg Windkraft GmbH	Compliance Assured
Noise Emissions	BImSchG; TA Lärm (40 dB(A) at night in residential areas)	1. Site layout optimized via sound propagation modeling. 2. Use of turbine's noise-optimized operational modes during sensitive periods.	Brandenburg Windkraft GmbH	Compliance Assured
Shadow Flicker	BImSchG; State Guidelines (30 min/day, 30 hrs/year)	1. Installation of Vestas Shadow Flicker Control System on all turbines for automated, predictive shutdowns.	Brandenburg Windkraft GmbH	Compliance Assured
Habitat Loss (Forest)	BNatSchG; Forestry Law	1. Siting exclusively in low-value pine monoculture. 2. Use of existing forest access roads to minimize new clearings. 3. Compensatory reforestation with native mixed-species trees at a ratio exceeding 1:1.	Brandenburg Windkraft GmbH / State Forestry Authority	Compliance Assured

 

5.4 Land Use and Decommissioning

 

The project's footprint will be carefully managed. The decision to site the project partially on managed pine forest, while controversial, is a calculated one. These monocultures have low ecological value compared to natural forests, and their use helps preserve higher-value agricultural land.² The project will minimize new clearings by utilizing existing forest access roads wherever possible. For every hectare of forest cleared for turbine pads and new access routes, the project will fund the compensatory reforestation of a larger area with a more ecologically valuable mix of native tree species, in consultation with state forestry authorities.²

A comprehensive decommissioning plan will be a mandatory part of the BImSchG permit. This will include the posting of a financial bond to guarantee that funds are available for the complete removal of the turbines, foundations, and substation at the end of the project's 25-year life. The plan will also outline a strategy for recycling and waste management. While most turbine components (steel tower, copper wiring, gearbox) are highly recyclable, the plan will specifically address the challenge of recycling the composite rotor blades, which remains a significant issue for the industry.⁵⁵

 

 

Section 6: Community Engagement and Social License to Operate

 

In the modern German energy landscape, a project's "social license to operate" is as critical as its technical permit. Public acceptance is no longer a passive outcome but an actively managed process. The Prignitz-Heide project's structure and engagement strategy are designed to build this social license from the ground up, moving beyond mere consultation to genuine partnership.

 

6.1 Analysis of the Citizen Energy Cooperative (CEC) Model

 

The cornerstone of the project's community strategy is the inclusion of "Bürgerwind Prignitz eG" as a 25% equity partner. The Citizen Energy Cooperative (Bürgerenergiegenossenschaft) is a deeply rooted institution in Germany's Energiewende, historically enabling thousands of citizens to invest in and benefit from local renewable energy projects.³ The legal form of a cooperative (

Genossenschaft) is particularly well-suited for this, as it is founded on democratic principles—typically one member, one vote, regardless of the size of the investment—which fosters a high degree of trust and social acceptance.⁴

However, the classic model of a 100% community-owned wind farm has come under immense pressure. The transition from guaranteed feed-in tariffs to a highly competitive auction system has significantly increased the financial risk and technical complexity of project development.⁴ Large-scale projects now require sophisticated financial modeling, risk management, and procurement strategies that can overwhelm volunteer-led cooperatives.⁵ This has led to a market shift, with the limited liability company structure (GmbH & Co. KG) becoming more common for large wind projects, as it is better suited to handling large capital requirements and complex risks.⁴

 

6.2 Evaluation of the Hybrid JV and Financial Participation

 

The Prignitz-Heide project's hybrid JV structure is a direct and innovative response to this evolving landscape. It recognizes the limitations of the traditional cooperative model while seeking to preserve its core benefits. By partnering with a professional developer (EEN AG), the Bürgerwind Prignitz eG can participate as a significant equity stakeholder without having to bear the full, front-loaded development risk and complexity.

The cooperative will raise its equity share (25% of the total, or approximately €12-€15 million after accounting for debt leverage) by offering shares to local citizens, municipalities, and businesses. This achieves several key objectives:

●       Direct Financial Benefit: It ensures that a substantial portion of the project's long-term profits flows directly back into the local economy, rather than exclusively to an external developer.

●       Democratic Participation: It provides a formal, democratic platform for the community to have a voice in the project's governance through its representation on the JV's board.

●       Increased Acceptance: Research consistently shows that financial participation is a key driver of public acceptance for wind projects. When local people are co-owners, they are more likely to view the project as a shared asset rather than an external imposition.⁵

The success of the cooperative itself will depend on several factors identified in academic research. It must find and empower committed "key individuals" from the community to lead its board, maintain a clear and simple business proposition for its members (i.e., investing in a professionally managed asset), and consistently uphold its social and ecological credibility.⁵

 

6.3 Stakeholder Relations: Engaging with NABU

 

Beyond the local community, the Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union (NABU) represents a critical and potentially adversarial stakeholder. NABU's Brandenburg chapter is highly active and influential. While generally supportive of the energy transition, NABU's official position is that wind energy expansion must be tied to a phase-out of lignite coal and, crucially, must not occur in forest areas due to the high risks for forest-dwelling species like bats and birds of prey.¹²

The project's plan to utilize some areas of managed forest creates a direct point of potential conflict with NABU's stated policy. A purely defensive or reactive approach to this conflict would be a strategic error, likely resulting in public opposition and legal challenges. Therefore, the project must implement a proactive and sophisticated engagement strategy:

1.     Acknowledge and Address Concerns: The project must approach NABU early in the development process, acknowledging the validity of their concerns about forest ecosystems.

2.     Provide Scientific Justification: The engagement should focus on presenting clear, scientific evidence that the project is sited exclusively in low-ecological-value pine monocultures, not in sensitive natural forests, and that the overall impact is minimized through the use of existing infrastructure.²

3.     Demonstrate "Best-in-Class" Mitigation: The project must present its multi-layered species protection plan—particularly the 1,500-meter Red Kite buffer and the AI-based anti-collision system—as a new benchmark for responsible development that goes far beyond legal minimums.

4.     Offer Partnership and Transparency: A key de-escalation tactic would be to offer NABU a formal, funded role in the project's long-term environmental monitoring. This could involve a seat on a community environmental advisory board and providing them with direct, transparent access to the data from the anti-collision system. This would transform them from an external critic into an internal watchdog, building trust and reducing the likelihood of litigation.

 

6.4 The Evolution from "Ownership" to "Partnership"

 

The structure of the Prignitz-Heide project reflects a fundamental evolution in the concept of "community energy" in Germany. The era of the small, 100% locally-owned Bürgerwindpark, enabled by the low-risk environment of fixed feed-in tariffs, is largely over for projects of this scale.³ The new reality of competitive auctions and multi-hundred-million-euro project costs requires a different model.

The focus has shifted from direct community ownership and operation to strategic community partnership and benefit-sharing. The community's role is evolving from that of a "do-it-yourself" developer to that of an influential equity partner. This new model is essential for enabling communities to participate in the larger, more efficient projects that are now needed to meet Germany's ambitious climate targets.

However, this evolution is not without risk. The primary danger is that such a partnership could be perceived as "community-washing"—a token gesture by a large developer to placate local opposition without granting any real power. The ultimate success of the Prignitz-Heide project's social license will therefore hinge on the details of its governance structure. The analysis of the project must extend to a close scrutiny of the JV's shareholder agreement. This agreement must provide the Bürgerwind Prignitz eG with tangible rights, including board representation, veto power over key decisions (such as the sale of the asset), and full transparency into the project's financial performance. Only by ensuring the partnership is authentic and empowers the community, rather than being merely symbolic, can the project secure the deep and resilient social acceptance it needs to succeed.

 

 

Section 7: Grid Integration and System Compatibility

 

Securing a physical connection to the electricity grid and ensuring the wind farm can operate as a stabilizing force within that system are critical technical and regulatory challenges. The Prignitz-Heide project's location within the 50Hertz Transmission GmbH control area subjects it to one of Europe's most demanding grid integration regimes.

 

7.1 Grid Connection to the 50Hertz Transmission System

 

Windpark Prignitz-Heide is situated within the 50Hertz control area, which covers northeastern Germany, including the state of Brandenburg.⁶¹ As a large-scale generator (150 MW), the project will connect directly to the extra-high-voltage (EHV) transmission grid, likely at the 220-kilovolt (kV) or 380-kV level, rather than to the lower-voltage distribution grid.⁶¹

The grid connection process is a complex and lengthy undertaking, separate from the BImSchG environmental permit.⁶³ It involves:

1.     Formal Application: Submitting a detailed grid connection request to 50Hertz.

2.     System Impact Study: 50Hertz will conduct extensive technical studies to determine the most suitable point of interconnection and to assess the impact of the new generation on the stability and load flow of the existing network.

3.     Grid Connection Agreement: A legally binding contract between Brandenburg Windkraft GmbH and 50Hertz detailing the technical and commercial terms of the connection.

4.     Infrastructure Construction: 50Hertz is responsible for any necessary reinforcements or expansions of the transmission grid to accommodate the new power feed-in. The project developer is responsible for constructing the on-site substation and the connection line to the designated interconnection point.⁶²

This process can take several years and requires close coordination between the developer and the transmission system operator (TSO).

 

7.2 Compliance with Technical Connection Rules (VDE-AR-N 4110/4120)

 

Connection to the German grid is governed by a highly detailed set of technical application rules (TAR) developed by the VDE FNN (Forum for Network Technology/Network Operation in the VDE). For a project connecting at the EHV level, the VDE-AR-N 4120 (TAR High Voltage) would apply. These rules translate the requirements of European network codes into specific, mandatory capabilities for generating plants.⁶⁶

The wind farm is not permitted to be a passive generator of electricity. It must be an active participant in maintaining grid stability. Key requirements include:

●       Fault Ride-Through (FRT): The ability to remain connected and support the grid during severe voltage dips (short circuits) on the network, preventing a cascading blackout.

●       Dynamic Voltage Support: The capability to rapidly inject or absorb reactive power to counteract voltage fluctuations and maintain stable voltage profiles.

●       Active Power / Frequency Control: The ability to precisely control its active power output and respond to deviations in the grid frequency (50 Hz) to help balance supply and demand in real-time.⁶⁶

Compliance with these demanding rules requires a rigorous certification process. The Vestas V162-6.0 MW turbines must have a "unit certificate" confirming their capabilities, and the entire wind farm's control system must receive a "plant certificate" based on complex simulation models before it is allowed to connect.⁶⁹ The advanced power electronics and control systems of the Vestas EnVentus platform are specifically designed to meet these stringent grid code requirements.

 

7.3 Assessment of Curtailment Risk and System Stability Contribution

 

A major operational and financial risk for the project is curtailment. The 50Hertz grid area in northeastern Germany has one of the highest concentrations of wind power in Europe.⁶¹ During periods of high wind and low local demand, the amount of electricity generated frequently exceeds the transmission capacity of the grid to transport it to consumption centers in southern and western Germany.⁷¹

When this congestion occurs, 50Hertz is forced to issue "redispatch" commands, ordering wind farms to curtail—or reduce—their output to prevent grid overloads.⁶¹ In 2023, approximately 4% of Germany's total renewable energy production was lost to curtailment, representing a direct and significant revenue loss for affected plant operators.¹⁷ This risk is particularly acute in the 50Hertz area.

However, the same advanced technical capabilities required for grid code compliance present a new opportunity. TSOs like 50Hertz are increasingly creating markets for "ancillary services"—the very grid stability functions that modern wind farms can provide. In April 2025, 50Hertz became the first German TSO to open a market-based tender for reactive power, allowing renewable energy plants and battery storage systems to compete to provide this voltage-stabilizing service and receive payment for it.⁷² This means the wind farm can earn revenue even when it is not feeding active power into the grid. The project's business model must therefore include a strategy for bidding into these emerging ancillary service markets to create a new revenue stream that can partially hedge against the financial losses from curtailment.

 

7.4 The Wind Farm as a "Grid Asset," Not Just a "Generator"

 

The confluence of high renewable penetration, grid congestion, and advanced technical regulations signifies a paradigm shift in the role of a large-scale wind farm. The old model, driven by simple feed-in tariffs, viewed a wind farm as a passive "generator" whose sole purpose was to maximize kilowatt-hour production. The new reality is far more complex.

The grid no longer needs just raw energy; it needs controllable, flexible resources that can help manage the intermittency of the system as a whole. The stringent requirements of the VDE grid codes and the emergence of ancillary service markets are transforming the wind farm from a simple "generator" into a dynamic "grid asset."

This shift has profound implications for the Prignitz-Heide project. Its success will depend not only on its LCOE and AEP but also on its ability to provide a portfolio of grid services. The project's profitability will be a function of both its energy sales and its revenue from ancillary services. This requires a higher level of technical and commercial sophistication. The project needs not only advanced inverters in its turbines but also an intelligent park controller and an energy management team or partner capable of optimizing its operations in real-time, deciding moment-by-moment whether it is more profitable to sell energy, provide reactive power, or participate in frequency control. The analysis of this project must therefore assess not just its plan for grid connection, but its comprehensive strategy for dynamic grid interaction. This strategy is no longer an optional extra; it is a core component of risk management and value creation in the modern German power system.

 

 

Section 8: Synthesis of Findings and Strategic Recommendations

 

The comprehensive analysis of the fictional Windpark Prignitz-Heide reveals a project that is thoughtfully designed to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of the contemporary German Energiewende. It is a project defined by a series of strategic trade-offs that demonstrate a mature understanding of the market's key risks and opportunities. This final section synthesizes the key findings, provides a holistic evaluation of the project's coherence, and offers actionable recommendations to further optimize and de-risk the venture.

 

8.1 Holistic Evaluation of Project Coherence, Clarity, and Consistency

 

The Prignitz-Heide project demonstrates a high degree of internal coherence. Its core components—the hybrid JV structure, the conservative technology choice, the proactive environmental mitigation plan, and the sophisticated grid integration strategy—are not isolated decisions but are logically interconnected responses to the central challenges identified in this analysis.

●       Coherence: The project's structure directly addresses the "Acceleration Paradox." It pairs the execution power of a large developer, necessary to meet accelerated timelines in a high-cost environment, with the community-based model required to secure social license in a landscape where public perception is increasingly critical.

●       Clarity: The project's objectives are clear: to deliver a large-scale, cost-competitive wind farm that meets Germany's national targets while serving as a benchmark for responsible development. The financial projections, technical specifications, and mitigation plans are based on transparent, defensible data and industry best practices.

●       Consistency: The project's risk posture is consistent across all domains. The choice of a proven 6.0 MW turbine over a newer 7.2 MW model is consistent with a strategy that prioritizes execution certainty over marginal performance gains. Similarly, the decision to exceed regulatory minimums for Red Kite protection is consistent with a strategy that prioritizes the pre-emption of legal challenges and the building of stakeholder trust.

Overall, the project presents as a robust, well-conceived venture. It avoids the pitfalls of simplistic, single-minded approaches and instead embraces the complexity of the modern energy market, balancing economic, technical, social, and environmental imperatives.

 

8.2 Comprehensive Risk Assessment Matrix

 

The following matrix consolidates the key risks identified throughout the analysis, assessing their likelihood and potential impact, and summarizing the project's proposed mitigation strategies. This provides a single-page strategic dashboard for decision-makers.

Risk Assessment and Mitigation Matrix: Windpark Prignitz-Heide
Risk Category	Specific Risk Description	Likelihood	Impact	Proposed Mitigation Strategy
Market / Financial	LCOE-Auction Price Squeeze: Tight margins between project costs and auction revenues limit profitability and increase sensitivity to cost overruns.	High	Medium	Develop and execute a hybrid revenue strategy, securing a baseload of revenue via auction and selling a merchant tail via PPAs/spot market to capture upside.
Permitting / Legal	Legal Challenge by NABU: Lawsuit filed by NABU or other ENGOs on grounds of forest use and/or species protection (Red Kite), causing significant delays (2+ years).	Medium	High	Proactive engagement with NABU. Exceed buffer zone requirements (1,500m). Deploy and offer transparent monitoring of AI-based Anti-Collision System.
Technical / Supply Chain	Turbine Delivery Delay: Supply chain disruptions or manufacturing issues at Vestas delay turbine delivery, impacting construction schedule and project costs.	Medium	High	Selection of the mature V162-6.0 MW model over newer variants to access a more established supply chain. Strong contractual penalties for delays in the Turbine Supply Agreement.
Grid / Operational	High Curtailment Rates: Frequent grid congestion in the 50Hertz area leads to high levels of curtailment, significantly reducing annual revenue.	High	Medium	Actively participate in 50Hertz's ancillary service markets (e.g., reactive power) to generate a secondary revenue stream that hedges against curtailment losses.
Social / Political	Erosion of Social License: The project is perceived as "community-washing" by a large developer, leading to local opposition and a loss of support for the citizen cooperative.	Low	High	Ensure the JV's shareholder agreement provides the cooperative with genuine governance rights, transparency, and influence. Continuous, open communication with the community.
Regulatory	Administrative Backlog: A surge in permit applications overwhelms the Brandenburg authorities, delaying the BImSchG permit beyond the planned timeline.	Medium	Medium	Maintain close and constant communication with the permitting authority. Provide a flawless and complete application to minimize requests for further information. Leverage political support at the state level.

 

8.3 Actionable Recommendations for Project Optimization and De-risking

 

Based on the comprehensive analysis, the following strategic recommendations are proposed to further enhance the project's viability and mitigate its key risks:

1.     Formalize the Hybrid Revenue Strategy: The project's financial model should be explicitly rebuilt around a hybrid revenue strategy. Detailed modeling should be undertaken to determine the optimal split between auction-secured capacity and merchant capacity to satisfy lenders while maximizing potential returns. This should be a Day 1 priority following the Final Investment Decision.

2.     Initiate Proactive Stakeholder "Peace Treaty": The engagement with NABU should be formalized immediately, well before the public hearing phase of the BImSchG process. The developer should make a formal, binding offer to: (a) fund an independent, third-party scientific monitor, approved by NABU, to oversee the installation and operation of the Red Kite Anti-Collision System for the first five years; and (b) grant NABU a permanent, non-voting seat on the project's environmental advisory board. This would be a powerful gesture of transparency aimed at pre-empting legal challenges.

3.     Establish a Dedicated Commercial Operations Team: To capitalize on the opportunity presented by ancillary service markets, the JV should plan for a dedicated commercial operations team or a partnership with a specialized energy trading firm. This team's mandate would be to actively manage the project's bidding strategy across the energy and ancillary service markets on a daily or even hourly basis, transforming the wind farm from a passive generator into an active, revenue-optimizing grid asset.

4.     Commission a "Repowering Readiness" Study: The developer should commission a formal engineering study with Vestas and a civil works contractor to assess the "repowering readiness" of the site's infrastructure. The study should quantify the additional upfront investment required in foundations and substation capacity to facilitate a seamless repowering with a future generation of 8-10 MW turbines in 25 years. This small additional CAPEX could significantly increase the project's long-term asset value and attractiveness to long-term investors.

By implementing these recommendations, the Windpark Prignitz-Heide can move beyond being merely a viable project to becoming a true benchmark for the next generation of onshore wind development in Germany.

 

 

Works cited

1.     Expanding wind energy for Germany | Federal Government - Bundesregierung.de, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/federal-government/onshore-wind-energy-act-2060954

2.     Project example in Brandenburg - greenwind, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.greenwindgroup.de/info/project-example-in-brandenburg/

3.     Community Wind Power - Bundesverband WindEnergie e.V., accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.wind-energie.de/fileadmin/redaktion/dokumente/dokumente-englisch/publications/bwe_broschuere_buergerwindparks_engl_10-2012.pdf

4.     Germany - Energy Communities - Publications, accessed July 5, 2025, https://pub.norden.org/nordicenergyresearch2023-03/germany.html

5.     (PDF) Success factors of citizen energy cooperatives in north western Germany: a conceptual and empirical review - ResearchGate, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361620356_Success_factors_of_citizen_energy_cooperatives_in_north_western_Germany_a_conceptual_and_empirical_review

6.     Citizens' participation in the Energiewende | Clean Energy Wire, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/citizens-participation-energiewende

7.     Status of Onshore Wind Energy Development in Germany Year 2022 - Bundesverband WindEnergie e.V., accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.wind-energie.de/fileadmin/redaktion/dokumente/dokumente-englisch/statistics/Status_of_Onshore_Wind_Energy_Development_in_Germany_Year_2022.pdf

8.     Status of Onshore Wind Energy Development in Germany Year 2023 - Bundesverband WindEnergie e.V., accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.wind-energie.de/fileadmin/redaktion/dokumente/dokumente-englisch/statistics/Status_of_Onshore_Wind_Energy_Development_in_Germany_Year_2023.pdf

9.     Potential of the energy transition for investors in Germany – Noerr Insight No 2: Onshore wind, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.noerr.com/en/insights/potential-of-the-energy-transition-for-investors-in-germany-insight-no-2-onshore-wind

10.  Germany cuts wind turbine approval times: 14 GW authorised in 2024, but regional gaps persist, accessed July 5, 2025, https://strategicenergy.eu/germany-wind-turbine-approval-times/

11.  JSDEWES: Regional Analysis of Potentials of Flexibility Options in the Electricity System for the Study Regions Prignitz in Brandenburg and Anhalt-Bitterfeld-Wittenberg in Saxony-Anhalt - SDEWES Centre, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0277

12.  Positionspapier Windkraft - NABU Brandenburg, accessed July 5, 2025, https://brandenburg.nabu.de/umwelt-und-ressourcen/energie/windkraft/20495.html

13.  Introduction - Global Wind Atlas, accessed July 5, 2025, https://globalwindatlas.info/about/introduction/

14.  Introduction - Global Wind Atlas, accessed July 5, 2025, https://globalwindatlas.info/fr/about/introduction

15.  V162-6.2 MW™ - Vestas, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.vestas.com/en/energy-solutions/onshore-wind-turbines/enventus-platform/v162-6-2-mw

16.  Wind energy potential of Germany - arXiv, accessed July 5, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.14159

17.  German onshore wind power – output, business and perspectives | Clean Energy Wire, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/german-onshore-wind-power-output-business-and-perspectives

18.  EnVentus™ Platform - Vestas, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.vestas.com/en/energy-solutions/onshore-wind-turbines/enventus-platform

19.  Vestas V162-6.0 EnVentus - 6,00 MW - Wind turbine, accessed July 5, 2025, https://en.wind-turbine-models.com/turbines/2294-vestas-v162-6.0-enventus

20.  Vestas wins 115 MW order in Germany for largest order of V172-7.2 MW turbines to date, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.vestas.com/en/media/company-news/2025/vestas-wins-115-mw-order-in-germany-for-largest-order-o-c4172477

21.  Status of Onshore Wind Energy Development in Germany First Half of 2024 - Deutsche WindGuard GmbH, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.windguard.com/half-year-2024.html?file=files/cto_layout/img/unternehmen/windenergiestatistik/2024/Status%20of%20Onshore%20Wind%20Energy%20Development%20in%20Germany_First%20Half%202024.pdf

22.  Protection of red kites - Dimensions Magazin, accessed July 5, 2025, https://dimensions-magazin.de/en/news/protection-of-red-kites/

23.  What is shadow flicker and does it impact me? - Vestas, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.vestas.com/en/energy-solutions/development/turnwindshadow

24.  Onshore Wind Permitting: Germany - NetZero Pathfinders, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.netzeropathfinders.com/best-practices/onshore-wind-permitting-germany

25.  Has Germany left behind its onshore wind turmoil? - tamarindo.global, accessed July 5, 2025, https://tamarindo.global/insight/analysis/has-germany-left-behind-its-onshore-wind-turmoil/

26.  Wind power in Germany - Wikipedia, accessed July 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power_in_Germany

27.  Germany | IEA Wind TCP, accessed July 5, 2025, https://iea-wind.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IEA_Wind_TCP_AR2021_Germany.pdf

28.  Wind power expansion in Germany - The South misses its targets : r/de - Reddit, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/de/comments/1lrbdlh/windkraftausbau_in_deutschland_der_s%C3%BCden_verfehlt/?tl=en

29.  Germany - IEA Wind TCP, accessed July 5, 2025, https://iea-wind.org/about-iea-wind-tcp/members/germany/

30.  New German Federal Planning and Permitting Law Plans - Watson Farley & Williams, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.wfw.com/articles/new-german-federal-planning-and-permitting-law-plans/

31.  German wind power sector in crisis. Energiewende under further threat, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2019-09-25/german-wind-power-sector-crisis-energiewende-under-further

32.  Germany installed 1.6 GW new onshore wind in the first semester; rigorously implements EU permitting measures | WindEurope, accessed July 5, 2025, https://windeurope.org/newsroom/news/germany-installed-1-6-gw-new-onshore-wind-in-the-first-semester-rigorously-implements-eu-permitting-measures/

33.  Environment group Nabu opposes expansion of wind energy in forests, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/can-natural-gas-be-green-chinas-e-car-plans-worry-carmakers/environment-group-nabu-opposes-expansion-wind-energy-forests

34.  Energy Outlook: Germany 2025 – Opportunities and challenges in the energy sector, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.wfw.com/articles/energy-outlook-germany-2025-opportunities-and-challenges-in-the-energy-sector/

35.  Demand high and prices fall at German 3.4GW onshore wind tender ..., accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.rechargenews.com/markets-and-finance/demand-high-and-prices-fall-in-german-3-4gw-onshore-wind-tender/2-1-1841430

36.  Press - Results of August onshore wind auction - Bundesnetzagentur, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/EN/2023/20230908_Onshore.html

37.  Wind Turbine Cost: How Much? Are They Worth It in 2025? - Weather Guard Lightning Tech, accessed July 5, 2025, https://weatherguardwind.com/how-much-does-wind-turbine-cost-worth-it/

38.  Investment costs - Wind Energy - The Facts, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.wind-energy-the-facts.org/index-43.html

39.  Study: Levelized Cost of Electricity- Renewable Energy Technologies, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ise/en/documents/publications/studies/EN2024_ISE_Study_Levelized_Cost_of_Electricity_Renewable_Energy_Technologies.pdf

40.  VESTAS V162 5.6MW New For Sale - MWPS World, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.mwps.world/market/used-wind-turbines-offered/3mw-5mw-wind-turbines/vestas-v162-5_6mw-new-for-sale/

41.  Photovoltaic Plants with Battery Cheaper than Conventional Power Plants - Fraunhofer ISE, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/press-media/press-releases/2024/photovoltaic-plants-with-battery-cheaper-than-conventional-power-plants.html

42.  Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG, latest version EEG 2023), accessed July 5, 2025, https://climate-laws.org/document/renewable-energy-sources-act-eeg-latest-version-eeg-2022_1b40

43.  Results of the auctions for onshore wind and solar installations on buildings and noise barriers - Bundesnetzagentur, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/EN/2024/20240308_SolarOnshore.html

44.  PPA price analysis for German onshore wind reveals big north-south divide - Veyt, accessed July 5, 2025, https://veyt.com/press-releases/location-location-location-ppa-price-analysis-for-german-onshore-wind-reveals-big-north-south-divide-2/

45.  Germany - IEA Wind TCP, accessed July 5, 2025, https://iea-wind.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Germany_2022.pdf

46.  Legal framework for wind onshore permitting in Germany, accessed July 5, 2025, https://energie-fr-de.eu/fr/manifestations/lecteur/conference-en-ligne-sur-leolien-terrestre-et-les-procedures-dautorisations.html?file=files/ofaenr/02-conferences/2021/211102_Onshore%20Genehmigungsverfahren/Presentations/02_Matthias_Laux_BMWi_OFATE_DFBEW.pdf

47.  Application preparation process | Clean energy for EU islands - European Union, accessed July 5, 2025, https://clean-energy-islands.ec.europa.eu/countries/germany/legal/permits-and-authorisation-processes/application-preparation-process

48.  Wind Energy: On the Path to the 2% Target - ACE Battery, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.acebattery.com/blogs/wind-energy-on-the-path-to-the-2-target

49.  Study on barriers to wind launched - MX Underwriting Europe, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.mxunderwriting.eu/insights/study-on-barriers-to-wind-launched

50.  German environment ministry weighs wind farm distance regulations to protect birds, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/german-environment-ministry-weighing-wind-farm-distance-regulations-protect-birds

51.  (PDF) Red Kites and Wind Farms—Telemetry Data from the Core ..., accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313263883_Red_Kites_and_Wind_Farms-Telemetry_Data_from_the_Core_Breeding_Range

52.  NABU Advocates for Expanded Wind Energy Sites Beyond Forest Areas in Berlin, accessed July 5, 2025, https://themunicheye.com/nabu-wind-energy-expansion-berlin-23377

53.  Environmental Assessments - BSH, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.bsh.de/EN/TOPICS/Offshore/Environmental_assessments/environmenta_assessments_node.html

54.  Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) of offshore wind farms - BSH, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.bsh.de/EN/TOPICS/Offshore/Environmental_assessments/Biology/biology_node.html

55.  Environmental Impact of Wind Farms - MDPI, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/11/11/257

56.  Assessing the spatial distribution of avian collision risks at wind turbine structures in Brandenburg, Germany - ResearchGate, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340436486_Assessing_the_spatial_distribution_of_avian_collision_risks_at_wind_turbine_structures_in_Brandenburg_Germany

57.  New noise emissions rules could bring nocturnal standstill for wind turbines in German state, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/coal-state-spd-push-national-carbon-price-storage-overrated/new-noise-emissions-rules-could-bring-nocturnal-standstill-wind-turbines-german-state

58.  Public participation in wind energy projects located in Germany: Which form of participation is the key to acceptance? - IDEAS/RePEc, accessed July 5, 2025, https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v112y2017icp63-73.html

59.  Energy cooperatives in Germany – an example of successful alternative economies?, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323082721_Energy_cooperatives_in_Germany_-_an_example_of_successful_alternative_economies

60.  Success factors of civic energy - COBEN, accessed July 5, 2025, https://coben.org/informer/files/COBEN%20-%20Success%20factors%20of%20civic%20energy.pdf

61.  The transmission grid of 50Hertz, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.50hertz.com/en/Grid

62.  50Hertz Transmission GmbH - Grid Expansion, accessed July 5, 2025, https://energiekueste.eu/projects/50hertz-transmission-gmbh-grid-expansion

63.  50hertz.com > Netz > Netzausbau > Projekte auf See > LanWin3, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.50hertz.com/de/Netz/Netzausbau/ProjekteaufSee/LanWin3

64.  50Hertz increases investments in grid infrastructure | 4C Offshore News, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.4coffshore.com/news/50hertz-increases-investments-in-grid-infrastructure-nid25102.html

65.  50Hertz awards contracts for cables to connect the Baltic Sea wind farm Gennaker to the transmission grid, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.windindustry-in-germany.com/windindustry/unternehmensmeldungen/50hertz-awards-contracts-for-cables-to-connect-the-baltic-sea-wind-farm-gennaker-to-the-transmission-grid

66.  VDE-AR-N 4110 - Infos und Praxisbeispiele (vom Elektroniker) - grimm-schaltanlagen.de, accessed July 5, 2025, https://grimm-schaltanlagen.de/vde-ar-n-4110/

67.  Anlagenzertifizierung – Voraussetzung für den Netzanschluss, accessed July 5, 2025, https://windenergietage.de/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/11/26WT0811_F2_1630_Wind_certification_Hickisch.pdf

68.  Technische Anschlussregel Mittelspannung (VDE-AR-N 4110), accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.vde.com/de/fnn/themen/tar/tar-mittelspannung-vde-ar-n-4110

69.  Ihr Anlagenzertifikat für Ihre Energie-Erzeugungsanlage - WIND-certification GmbH, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.wind-certification.de/anlagenzertifikat/

70.  Anwendungshilfe - zum „Zertifizierungspaket“ für Erzeugungsanlagen - BDEW, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.bdew.de/media/documents/%C3%B6ffentlich_-_21052024-_BDEW-Anwendungshilfe_Zertifizierungspaket_final.pdf

71.  System control - 50Hertz, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.50hertz.com/en/Grid/Systemcontrol

72.  Germany's 50Hertz opens up reactive power market to renewables, battery storage, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.ess-news.com/2025/04/03/germanys-50hertz-opens-up-reactive-power-market-to-renewables-battery-storage/